Unpacking ‘Storming the Ivory Tower’: A Deep Dive into Richard Corcoran’s Bold Commentary on Culture, Drug Use, and Political Correctness

Richard Corcoran’s book, Storming the Ivory Tower, dives into a controversial transformation at the New College of Florida, a small institution often described as too liberal for its state. Corcoran begins with a bold critique of prominent news outlets for failing to present balanced perspectives. The book’s opening highlights how, in early 2023, Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis appointed six new trustees, including Corcoran, to reshape this struggling college.

In the U.S., state governors wield significant power over university systems. This contrasts with the more autonomous approach seen in the UK. For example, imagine if a politician had the authority to select the leadership at universities like those in Greater Manchester; that’s essentially what’s happening in Florida.

Corcoran argues that DeSantis’s changes were essential for reviving a college that, with just 650 students, felt unwelcoming to many. Some admitted students described the campus atmosphere as dominated by “politically correct” views. Corcoran points out that such a reputation directly contradicts what a university should strive for if it wants to attract a diverse student body.

Despite its size, New College’s makeover has stirred significant political and financial support. Critics argue that it’s unusual for so much public funding to be dedicated to such a small institution. Changes under Corcoran included shifting focus away from controversial topics like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and gender studies, areas he claims are not effective in a liberal arts context.

A notable chapter discusses the attack by Hamas on October 7, which exposed deeper issues within academia regarding the freedom of expression. Corcoran highlights the importance of robust dialogue on sensitive topics, warning against the risks of dismissing critical discussions.

Interestingly, the college’s new direction is a mix of interventionist politics and conservative ideology. Corcoran, unlike some of his colleagues, believes in using existing governmental structures to effect change rather than abolishing them altogether.

Despite the controversies surrounding New College, it serves as a microcosm of broader trends in American higher education. Recent statistics indicate a growing divide in the political landscape within academia, with studies showing that nearly 70% of college faculty lean left. This situation begs the question: are institutions like New College a bellwether for wider changes in higher education norms?

Corcoran’s story includes his battles with the media and attempts to improve campus facilities. He reflects on his experience navigating opposition and press scrutiny, indicating significant challenges in leadership roles, especially in education. His conclusion includes a nine-point plan emphasizing strong leadership and the necessity of institutional change.

Ultimately, this book is more than just a narrative of one college; it’s a glimpse into the potential future of higher education. Engaging with diverse perspectives, irrespective of one’s ideological leaning, is crucial for fostering a well-rounded educational landscape. As debates in academia continue to intensify, understanding these dynamics will be essential for anyone involved in education today.

Source link