Recent research has revealed that modern humans may have roots in not just one, but two ancient populations that diverged and later reunited. This groundbreaking study from the University of Cambridge used advanced genome analysis to trace back human ancestry and challenge long-standing theories.
Scientists found that these ancestral groups split around 1.5 million years ago. Approximately 300,000 years ago, they came back together. One group contributed about 80% of the genetics of modern humans, while the other added 20%. This study, published in Nature Genetics, offers a more intricate narrative than the previously accepted notion that Homo sapiens descended from a single lineage in Africa around 200,000 to 300,000 years ago.
Dr. Trevor Cousins, one of the lead authors, reflects on the allure of our origins. “Many have believed we evolved from a single continuous ancestral line, but the truth seems far more intricate,” he states. Professor Richard Durbin, a co-author, emphasizes the significance of their findings, which reveal a history of diverse groups developing separately for millennia before merging to form what we recognize as modern humans today.
Interestingly, while past research noted interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans about 50,000 years ago, this study suggests a much earlier mixture of genes around 300,000 years ago. Unlike Neanderthal DNA—making up approximately 2% of non-African genomes—this ancient mixing contributed significantly larger amounts of genetic information, detectable in all modern humans.
The research team utilized a unique approach by analyzing modern DNA instead of ancient remains. They applied a computational tool called cobraa, which models how ancient populations split and merged, using data from the 1000 Genomes Project—a comprehensive DNA sequencing initiative spanning diverse global populations.
Interestingly, the analysis hinted at a significant change right after these groups split, where one population faced a severe bottleneck. This group would later account for the bulk of modern human genetics and appears to be the precursor to both Neanderthals and Denisovans. Yet, the minority population brought genes linked to critical functions in the brain, likely aiding human evolution.
In addition to examining human ancestry, the cobraa model was tested with data from bats, dolphins, and chimpanzees. The findings indicate that ancestral structures also exist in these species, supporting the notion that evolution is not a neat, linear process but one filled with interbreeding and genetic exchange.
As for who these ancestors were, fossil records suggest species like Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis could be linked to these ancient populations. However, more research is needed to clarify these connections.
Looking ahead, researchers plan to refine their methods to explore gradual genetic changes over time and deepen their understanding of early human diversity in light of fossil evidence suggesting a richer history than previously assumed. “It’s remarkable that we can unravel events from so long ago using today’s DNA,” says Professor Aylwyn Scally. “It shows our past is far more complex and fascinating than we thought.”
This new genetic insight not only sheds light on human origins but challenges how we view evolution across species. For further information, the study can be found in Nature Genetics. You can read more about it here.
Source link
Science, Physics News, Science news, Technology News, Physics, Materials, Nanotech, Technology, Science