Why ‘F1 the Movie’ Falls Short: A Deep Dive into Its Repetitive Racing Formula

Have you seen the latest racing film, “F1”? It stars Brad Pitt as Sonny Hayes, an American ex-racer who’s called to the U.K. to help a struggling Formula One team. It’s a classic underdog story, full of familiar tropes. The team must win, or they risk being sold. Sonny’s laid-back style draws him closer to his diverse teammates, and his dynamic with a demanding female boss adds more flavor to the mix. If you liked “Ted Lasso,” you might find this similar vibe appealing.

In fact, “F1” shares some themes with “Gran Turismo,” another recent racing movie. In it, a young Black driver, played by Damson Idris, faces his own challenges, including a terrifying crash. Both films highlight personal growth and resilience against the odds. This theme is common in sports films because it resonates with many of us: overcoming struggles to achieve victory.

However, “F1” has received mixed reviews. Critics point out that the script feels clichéd and repetitive. It follows a standard formula—training montages, crashes, and last-minute victories—but fails to innovate. Fans of sports movies might enjoy the expected emotional highs and lows, but some are left wanting more depth and excitement.

Sonny Hayes is depicted as the cool, easygoing hero, reminiscent of Pitt’s character in “Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood.” His laid-back demeanor might work for a charm offensive, but it doesn’t match the intensity brought by other leading actors like Tom Cruise. Many believe that’s part of why “F1” doesn’t hit the high notes it aims for.

Formula One racing is still an exotic sport for many in the U.S., which adds another layer of challenge. New viewers might find it tough to follow the rules and strategies, such as safety cars and pit stops. While Sonny adopts an aggressive racing style that works, it clashes with the perfectionist rookie, Joshua Pearce, complicating their relationship.

The film struggles to maintain tension. It speeds toward an unsatisfying climax, and the motives of the characters feel jumbled. By the time the race approaches its peak, viewers might feel the pacing drag, especially with a runtime of over two and a half hours.

Despite these issues, director Joseph Kosinski showcases impressive filmmaking skills. The visuals, paired with Hans Zimmer’s stirring score, amplify the racing experience. Idris brings youthful energy opposite Pitt, who still delivers a compelling performance. But the muddled script holds the film back—without that spark, the story struggles to gain traction.

As an expert in sports psychology noted, the emotional journey in sports films can inspire audiences. But if the narrative feels predictable, that inspiration can get lost. It highlights the difference between a good sports movie and a great one—engagement and originality are key. While “F1” has its moments, some fans may wish it took bigger risks to truly rev up the excitement.

Overall, while “F1” offers a familiar story of triumph and teamwork, it might just fall short for viewers craving something fresh. The true challenge for filmmakers is recognizing when to innovate rather than follow in established footsteps.

Source link