Wisconsin Judge Upholds Musk’s $1 Million Voter Payments as Attorney General Launches Appeal

A Wisconsin judge recently made headlines by allowing billionaire Elon Musk to proceed with giving away $1 million checks to two voters. This event is part of a rally planned right before a crucial Supreme Court election in the state. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul argues that Musk’s offer is illegal, claiming it violates a state law prohibiting payments to voters.

The stakes in this Supreme Court race are high. Both Musk and former President Donald Trump are backing Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel. Meanwhile, Democrats are supporting Dane County Judge Susan Crawford. The election is intensifying, with more than $20 million already spent—setting a record for a judicial election in Wisconsin. Control of the court is up for grabs, especially since liberals currently hold a slim 4-3 majority, and a recent retirement puts that majority at risk.

Musk’s strategy of rewarding voters isn’t new. He previously used a similar tactic during the last presidential election, offering $1 million daily to voters who signed a petition in Wisconsin and other key states. A judge in Pennsylvania ruled that such payments did not constitute an illegal lottery, allowing the initiative to continue.

The implications of this election extend beyond just party lines. The Wisconsin Supreme Court is expected to rule on critical issues such as abortion rights, redistricting, union power, and voting rules—subjects that could significantly influence the upcoming midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

As for Musk’s recent rally, he initially claimed he’d provide $2 million to two voters who had already cast ballots. The Attorney General is pushing for Musk to halt these giveaways, especially since the initial announcement was deleted. However, there has been no official word canceling the payments.

This unusual fundraising tactic has sparked debate online. Social media platforms are buzzing with comments, some supporting Musk’s approach as a bold stance against perceived activism in the judiciary, while others criticize it as unethical. Public reaction has also underscored the growing trend where financial incentives are tied to voter participation—a practice that raises questions about the integrity of elections in America.

For more information about election laws and the ongoing case, you can refer to this state law overview.

Source link

Wisconsin,

Check out this related article: 3 Eye-Opening Charts That Reveal How Trump’s Car Tariffs Will Affect American Consumers

Elon Musk, Donald Trump, George Soros, Voting, Wisconsin state government, General news, WI State Wire, 2020 United States presidential election, Josh Kaul, Courts, Politics, Susan Crawford, Elections, Andrew Voigt, U.S. news, Brad Schimel, U.S. News