How SpaceX’s Starlink Satellite Signals Are Impacting Astronomy: What You Need to Know

Space is often quiet at the frequencies radio telescopes seek. However, in recent years, scientists have detected interference from a bustling new neighbor: SpaceX’s Starlink satellites. A team led by Steven Tingay from Curtin University traced this interference to nearly 2,000 Starlink satellites.

Radio telescopes are searching for signals from neutral hydrogen, a gas from the early universe. These signals are incredibly faint—about a thousand times weaker than what we receive from a modern cell tower. Unfortunately, even unintended emissions from satellites can overpower these crucial signals. Research showed that some satellite leakage can match the brightest natural radio sources, burying important data at key frequencies.

Tingay analogized the situation: "It’s like adding strong artificial sources to a sky already filled with a few natural ones."

To study this, the team positioned 256 dipole antennas over a quiet desert area. In just under a month, they gathered nearly 2.5 million full-sky images across a range of frequencies. Advanced software compared these images with real-time satellite positions, logging unexpected spikes in brightness linked to passing satellites. The results were concerning: 1,806 Starlink satellites were responsible for disruptions, many showing signals in the 170 megahertz band, critical for studying the early universe.

The interference observed had two main characteristics. Most satellites emitted a broad, continuous hum, while others produced sharp pulses at regular intervals. These emissions could reach levels that significantly overshadow natural space signals, with certain pulses being as bright as seven million janskys.

A data expert on Tingay’s team, Dylan Grigg, pointed out that the best solution might require satellite operators to reduce or eliminate these unwanted emissions. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) allocates specific frequency bands for radio astronomy. Unfortunately, the Starlink emissions showed up in these protected areas, with 703 satellites detected just in one of the lower bands.

Current regulations apply only to deliberate transmissions, so technically, these satellites are not breaking any rules. However, the power difference between their leaks and cosmic signals can be immense—up to 10,000 times stronger.

To mitigate this, Starlink has made adjustments to reduce visible light emissions from the satellites. A similar approach could be taken to minimize radio signal leakage. Physical changes, such as better shielding around equipment, could help minimize these emissions. On the software side, filtering out satellite noise on Earth could work, but it might require immense computing power.

Future satellite networks like Amazon’s Kuiper and OneWeb also plan to launch thousands of satellites. Without new standards, their emissions could create a persistent noise in low-frequency astronomy, making it difficult to understand cosmic events like the formation of the first galaxies.

Astronomers are pushing the ITU to set regulations for unintended emissions, akin to rules already present for ground-based electronics. Creating limits for leakage would guide satellite makers and perhaps ensure satellites are certified before launch.

As Tingay remarked, the need for action is urgent. SpaceX launches new satellites almost weekly, meaning this problem is only going to worsen. If regulations aren’t established soon, recovering a clear sky might become impossible.

This issue highlights a growing tension between space technology and scientific exploration. While we benefit from innovations like satellite internet, we must balance these advancements with the need to preserve our ability to explore and understand the universe.

For a detailed study on this matter, you can refer to the findings published in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Source link