The Fallout of the Global Plastics Treaty’s Collapse: What It Means for Food Safety and Security

As concerns about plastic pollution grow, it’s clear that food systems must be part of these discussions. Louis Sentenac and Kunal Mehta from DSM-Firmenich highlight the need for governments and businesses to safeguard food security in the face of plastic waste.

Plastics are a big part of our lives. They keep food safe and make healthcare possible. But they also pollute our rivers, oceans, and even harm our health. Each year, the world produces around 460 million tons of plastic, but only 9% gets recycled. The rest ends up in the environment.

Research warns that without action, plastic waste going into our oceans could nearly triple by 2040. This isn’t just an environmental issue; it’s a human one. Recently, over 180 countries tried to create a global treaty on plastic pollution. However, after tense discussions, they failed to reach an agreement. Differences over production limits, design rules, and financial responsibilities hindered progress.

This setback reminds us that solving this crisis requires more than just government action. It’s essential for businesses and communities to take the lead. Leaders need to think long-term about the impacts of their choices on food security and the planet’s health.

Food systems are particularly impacted by plastic pollution. While plastics help to keep food fresh and safe, they also pose risks. The effects of climate change and supply chain issues make addressing plastics part of a much larger conversation about creating resilient food systems. Policies need to consider the entire lifecycle of plastics in food, from farming to disposal.

Consumers are becoming more aware of the environmental impact of their food choices. They want transparency about production methods and packaging. For businesses, this means being accountable and moving beyond superficial efforts known as greenwashing. Real change includes reducing plastic use and promoting sustainable practices.

Governments are responding with stricter plastic regulations. Some companies are proactively developing solutions that benefit both people and the planet, rather than waiting for mandatory changes.

The breakdown of the global treaty should not be seen as a defeat. It highlights the urgent need for action. Plastic pollution is now a public health and food security crisis, and future discussions must reflect this urgency.

Four key priorities can help guide effective action:

1. Prioritize Food Systems: Policies must consider how plastics in agriculture affect food safety.
2. Set Clear Guidelines: Strengthening waste management and supporting farmers in moving away from plastics is essential.
3. Look Beyond Packaging: Consider every step in the supply chain to improve sustainability.
4. Build Collaborations: Cooperation between industries, governments, and NGOs is vital to share data and develop uniform standards.

Plastics are part of our lives, but so is our responsibility to use them wisely. Today’s decisions will impact the quality of our food, health, and environment for generations. Instead of using the treaty failure as an excuse, we should see it as a call to action. Leaders must prioritize long-term benefits over short-term gains. History shows that when communities unite for a common goal, transformative change is achievable. We can create a fair food system that benefits everyone. If we fail, future generations will pay the price.

For more comprehensive insights on the situation, you can explore the United Nations Environment Programme.

Source link