Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump had a significant phone call that lasted two hours. Trump called it an “excellent” conversation, while Putin found it “meaningful and frank.” They discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine but didn’t agree on key points.
Trump wanted to push for a 30-day ceasefire, which Ukraine had already accepted. However, Putin rejected it, maintaining that Russia’s goals in the conflict remain the same. This response shows a persistent divide in their perspectives on ending the war.
Interestingly, Trump’s take on the call was upbeat compared to the reality. He suggested that negotiations would soon start and hinted that the Vatican could facilitate discussions. Despite expressing optimism, the situation on the ground remained unchanged, as Putin reiterated that Russia’s demands would essentially weaken Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Putin claimed Russia could support halting hostilities but stressed the need to address the “root causes” of the conflict—its extensive territorial demands, which many see as a challenge to Ukraine’s independence.
Zelenskyy, Ukraine’s president, responded firmly, asserting Ukraine won’t withdraw its troops from the territories Russia claims to control. He called for increased sanctions if Russia rejected peace efforts, emphasizing that pressure is necessary for real progress.
The backdrop to these talks is a series of diplomatic conversations. Just days before Putin and Trump spoke, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators met in Istanbul. Unfortunately, that meeting fell apart when Russia demanded more land as a condition to stop fighting.
While Trump’s remarks were optimistic, they might not be grounded in the current realities of the war. Even as EU leaders express concerns about Trump’s approach, he seems to be pulling back on earlier aggressive stances against Russia.
According to a recent survey, 70% of Ukrainians believe that continued international support is critical to their defense. This highlights the importance of unity among allies in pressuring Russia.
Experts suggest that resolving this conflict isn’t just about diplomacy. It requires a clear understanding of both sides’ demands and the geopolitical landscape. JD Vance, the U.S. Vice President, mentioned that the U.S. might reconsider its role if negotiations stall. He expressed that, “it takes two to tango,” implying that if Russia resists peace, the U.S. may have to step back.
The tension grows as diplomatic efforts unfold. Both Ukraine and its allies are watching closely, hoping for a resolution that respects Ukraine’s sovereignty and brings lasting peace. As leaders converse, the world remains on edge, waiting to see if these talks will lead to any genuine change.
Source link