Trump Endorses Hegseth for Defense Secretary Amid Controversy Over Second Strike Denial – Live Updates on US Politics

Trump Responds to Controversial Military Strike Off Venezuela

Recently, President Trump addressed allegations regarding military action against a drug-smuggling boat near Venezuela. This operation reportedly resulted in the deaths of two survivors from an initial airstrike. Speaking from Air Force One, Trump defended Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, firmly stating he did not authorize a second strike.

“Pete said he did not order the death of those two men,” Trump asserted. “I’ll look into it, but no, I wouldn’t have wanted that – not a second strike. The first strike was very lethal.”

This matter first gained traction through The Washington Post, indicating that Hegseth allegedly directed a follow-up strike to eliminate any remaining individuals aboard the vessel. Hegseth has denied these claims, labeling them as “fake news” while insisting that previous strikes complied with both U.S. and international laws.

The situation has triggered calls for a deeper investigation from Congress. Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are expressing serious concerns. Senator Mark Kelly mentioned, “We’re going to have a public hearing… and find out what happened. There needs to be accountability.”

Experts suggest that the actions described in the reports could fit the definition of a war crime, especially considering the Geneva Conventions’ rules against targeting wounded individuals. The United Nations’ human rights chief, Volker Turk, indicated that there’s strong evidence these actions may constitute extrajudicial killings.

The background on U.S. military activity in the region reveals an increase in naval operations since September, resulting in over 80 reported deaths, as per U.S. Defense Department figures. However, claims about the legality of these strikes remain controversial, with Venezuela’s National Assembly labeling them as “murder.”

Recent user reactions on social media highlight a split opinion, with many supporting the need for increased oversight, while others defend the actions as necessary for national security.

This unfolding story raises critical questions about military accountability, international laws, and the implications of such actions — topics that merit public discussion as well as rigorous inquiry from legislative bodies.

For continuous updates on this topic, visit trusted news sources like The Guardian to stay informed.

Source link