Senator Bernie Sanders has recently backed former President Donald Trump’s plan to convert federal grants into equity stakes for chipmakers, notably Intel. This move is part of a larger push to increase U.S. semiconductor production and reduce reliance on foreign chips.
Sanders supports the notion that if companies benefit from taxpayer-funded grants, the public deserves a return on that investment. This comes from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, which allocated $39 billion to encourage domestic semiconductor manufacturing.
Now, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is exploring how the government can take ownership stakes in companies like Intel in exchange for these grants. This strategy reflects a surprising partnership between Sanders and Trump, signaling a shift toward government involvement in the economy—an approach typically associated with more left-leaning politics.
Historically, similar instances of bipartisan support for economic policies are rare. For instance, both parties have rallied around the importance of advancing technology and reducing dependence on foreign production, especially in the context of the ongoing trade tensions with China. This aligns with past initiatives aimed at supporting domestic industries, often driven by national security concerns.
In a recent interview, tech economist John W. Wozniak stressed that U.S. chip independence is critical for maintaining competitive advantages, especially as artificial intelligence technology rapidly evolves. According to a 2023 report from the Semiconductor Industry Association, about 92% of the world’s semiconductors are currently produced abroad.
Wozniak noted that while investments are essential, aligning taxpayer interests with corporate growth remains crucial. “A balance must be struck,” he remarked, emphasizing the need for transparency in how funds are allocated.
Despite the positive rhetoric around these initiatives, Wall Street has reacted cautiously. Reports indicate Intel’s stock dipped by over 7% following the announcement of government equity stakes. Investors appear apprehensive about potential government intervention influencing company management and strategy.
As the U.S. gears up for more substantial investment in semiconductor production, it remains to be seen how this unprecedented governmental role will unfold and what it means for the future of tech innovation. While the intent is to bolster national security and industry growth, the effects on both the market and taxpayer interests will be closely monitored in the coming months.
Source link
Economy, News, Business and Economy, Donald Trump, Manufacturing, Politics, Science and Technology, Technology, United States, US & Canada